Since Twitter is not currently subject to regulations forbidding it from censoring whatever it wants, we can't claim free speech. It's possible 's backers could put pressure on @Jack to censor the deserved backlash against her. I haven't seen any physical threats against her, but there are literally millions of people standing with JD, so it's possible. Most are using her own recorded words against her in addition to her sordid public records that she's sealed or tried to have erased.Chocolat wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 6:15 pmCould it be that her side is upset, not because Depp fans are doing a "tit for tat" with AH fans, but are so top notch in their detective work of finding dirt on not just AH but learning of the connections between her and other legal associates? Seriously, I am quite impressed with the information that's been discovered and collected regarding AH's misbehavior and sneaky tricks as well as pointing out the errors of Justice Nichol's past verdicts. Furthermore, if Depp fans are any way responsible for getting any Judge's knickers in a knot, I do believe JD's team would let us know. For example, Stephen Deuters recently posted this on his Twitter page:ForeverYoung wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:21 pmSo Amber gets to break three court orders for her deposition (one of the excuses was a lie) in the dv matter and he gets sanctioned? I am so sick of her doing things and then crucifying someone else for doing the same, except his was not court ordered. This is why I have no pity for the threats against her.
"Thank you for the overwhelming support in the face of palpable adversity. We see you."
I would think he or someone on the Depp team would convey a scolding, as well, if we were out of line.
As much as I don't necessarily support hard core insults or graphics directed at AH and company, pointing out her and her cohorts wrong doings are fair game, in my opinion. It is certainly important to inform the general public who she really is and what she has done since main stream media isn't doing their job. For goodness sake, Johnny has been called a wife beater! That is just wrong. That said, I will shout from the roof top that Amber Heard is a husband beater, because the truth comes from her own words.
Also possible that some threats are her supporters posing as JD fans. Her supporters get away with far worse things than Depp stans are accused of. They frequently wish him dead & post funeral photos of him. I have seen death threats against JD, specifically when he took the stage as Grindelwald at ComicCon. So it isn't true that people were forgetting about her claims against him (esp journalists who've treated him like a pariah since 2016 ) and that there was no need to take legal action against her.
What, exactly, is her protected status? Queen Mera? Everyone on Twitter gets insulted. There are campaigns against people all the time. Johnny, e.g., gets maligned all the time for things having nothing to do with Amber. He doesn't demand anyone be silenced. Why does she get away with flouting legal requests & orders going back to 2016? Why does Johnny get nailed with fines & sanctions and she doesn't? Does the court see her as a delicate, vulnerable flower? Courts are really showing their bias in favor of women and it's sickening. Or is the fix already in? If so, I hope JD's high-paid attys would share that with him & save him more court costs by ending this.
I don't want showings of public support to cause trouble for JD with the court, but how can the judge expect his team to control literally millions of people? These are people outraged at the injustice being done to Johnny, not all of them fans of his.
I don't see anything wrong with publishing facts against her. In case the tech overlords decide to shut our voices down, it's best to do so sooner than later.
I'm focusing on trying to get JD back as Grindelwald. It's a longshot, but I would like to see him back in that role now that I've read that 3 will be focusing at least 50% on Dumbledore & Grindelwald. 3 is Johnny's number.