
Sweeney!

Agreed Chocolat.
I like the way this and the Sun paperwork stays focused on just a few incidents. It's crisp, clear, concise, backed up by evidence admitted to the respective courts. I wonder if he was forced to go after her directly since the Sun presumably couldn't get her to testify/cooperate?
He could probably expose a great many more lies or hoaxes (perhaps the Australian dog incident, etc.) than he does here.
I recall her "testimony" in Australia where she said something about not having time to prepare the paperwork on the dogs because she was concerned about and taking care of her husband after his hand surgery. If Johnny's documentation is true, then she was already with Musk in some capacity and the direct cause of his hand injury. This could explain why Johnny didn't take the wrap on the dog issue for her, but instead, let her be charged and prosecuted. Whatever she said under oath in Australia could come back on her someday, too.
Also, in the British GQ article, it was mentioned that someone (Rowling/Warner Bros/FB) hired a crisis management team to orchestrate the GQ article. I wonder if this team is directly or indirectly involved with the Sun and the Op/Ed lawsuits, as well as, the quiet settlements of the TMG, bodyguards, City of Lies lawsuits.
These battles are being chosen very carefully and systematically.