The Lawsuits Thread

Discuss the latest Johnny Depp news, his career, past and future projects, and other related issues.
Granna
Posts: 281
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2019 12:44 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Granna » Tue Apr 06, 2021 12:24 pm

ForeverYoung: please keep everyone in the loop on this. Now . . . how about throwing AH under the bus - is there a ribbon in the works? Should be.

Would it not be delightful to make sure that. Disney, Warner Brothers, L'oréal, ACLU and the UN (AH's honorary post) got these ribbons too?

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 1595
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Tue Apr 06, 2021 1:08 pm

I will let you know when I have more details.

“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

User avatar
fireflydances
ONBC Moderator
Posts: 3402
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:15 pm
Location: under a pile of books
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by fireflydances » Tue Apr 06, 2021 4:16 pm

Purple ribbons is a neat idea. I assume we pay for same and ship to studios et al? I picture incoherent mobs of purple swamping delivery points.
"Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed and some few to be chewed and digested." Sir Francis Bacon, Of Studies

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 1595
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Tue Apr 06, 2021 4:24 pm

I am not sure but I guess we will know when more info gets released.

“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 1595
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Tue Apr 06, 2021 6:22 pm

Great video showing her lies.

“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 1595
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Wed Apr 07, 2021 8:30 pm

Today was the due date for Johnny's team to file their listing of attorney fees to oppose the ex's motion. The ex's team has 7 days to oppose.

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/s ... 1-2021.pdf
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

Someareborn
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 7:16 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Someareborn » Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:55 pm

Ongoing twitter chat about Adams posts. He, maybe implied, that the second set of officers had body cams on them? And, that he has obtained the footage? What are your thoughts about it?

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1469
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Fri Apr 09, 2021 6:13 pm

Someareborn wrote:
Fri Apr 09, 2021 5:55 pm
Ongoing twitter chat about Adams posts. He, maybe implied, that the second set of officers had body cams on them? And, that he has obtained the footage? What are your thoughts about it?
I believe they will be in Johnny’s favor based in what Adam was tweeting

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1469
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Fri Apr 09, 2021 6:13 pm

Ben Chew had refile for the legal fees Jude White awarded Johnny.

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1469
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Fri Apr 09, 2021 6:15 pm

Johnny has refuted his motion to compel with the new judge for April 30


https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/s ... 8-2021.pdf

Original for reference which includes attachment of their questions
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/s ... 2-2021.pdf

I think he is also asking for legal fees and sanctions

Someareborn
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 7:16 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Someareborn » Sat Apr 10, 2021 5:44 am

I am curious about Adams' hints concerning possible body cam foootage.
But I asked myself why AH asked for it in her subpoena, knowing that it could further undermine her hoax. Somebody on twitter explained that she may have asked about it in the first place to discredit the officers if they had indeed no footage. Its a good theory! And it would backfire if there is indeed footage in JD's favour.

Altough I am not sure how powerful it would be, because it is assumed to belong to the second set of officers. Even if it contains a blurry picture of her uninjured face - it would be explained away. Best output would probably be to debunk the lie of "a messy crime scene"
I keep my fingers crossed - a nice weekend to you all!

AdeleAgain
Posts: 1089
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 8:06 am
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by AdeleAgain » Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:25 am

But maybe it means we've finally got to the bottom of who the second set of officers are. That's how I read Adam's last tweet. I know he liked a reply asking about body cameras. And if we have four officers giving testimony in VA that she was uninjured and the place wasn't wrecked - that's doubly powerful.

I still cannot get past a UK judge dismissing the evidence of US police officers. Just disgraceful. I don't think a jury (of any nationality) will be quite so dismissive.

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 1595
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Tue Apr 13, 2021 10:01 am

Here is an article about how the ex committed perjury.

https://www.sausageroll.com.au/lifestyl ... f-perjury/
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1469
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Tue Apr 13, 2021 10:03 am

ForeverYoung wrote:
Tue Apr 13, 2021 10:01 am
Here is an article about how the ex committed perjury.

https://www.sausageroll.com.au/lifestyl ... f-perjury/
Found it interesting. Can’t say I agree with all of it but I hope his team sees it

Someareborn
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 7:16 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Someareborn » Tue Apr 13, 2021 6:08 pm

AdeleAgain wrote:
Sat Apr 10, 2021 7:25 am
And if we have four officers giving testimony in VA that she was uninjured and the place wasn't wrecked - that's doubly powerful.
It would be, if both parties had the same standard about what a place being wrecked looks like.
If the officers saw the spilled wine on the rug and consider it as a "household accident" not worth mentioning in a report f.e. it would fuel her narrative. (Cops were not investigating properly) That is why I hope that any possible footage would show no wine spilled and no clothing racks unturned.

Am I surprised that the only "real + costly damage with photographic evidence" would be the spilled wine on a rug in a rather public area?
Despite the massive bead desaster and broken things in apt. 3 she and her friends describe? Not at all - I assume she didn't want to break her things and destroy her "soon-to-be-mine-penthouse" too much.