


The letter was posted on TMZ and was all over social media so I don't see how his side can't use it for evidence to show she wanted "nothing", imo. Her interior decorator also made a statement that the ex put post its on things from the apartment(s) that she was not supposed to have when she was helping the ex move out but she did not know it at the time.nebraska wrote: ↑Sat May 21, 2022 8:44 pmWhen Laura Wasser testified she mentioned receiving the extortion letter and a small image appeared on the screen, so it seems to me that it can be read out to rebut Amber's testimony that she "wanted nothing".
Can Johnny also claim attorney/client privilege if he is called?
Emily D Baker did a brief video (on You Tube)and said that Johnny can claim attorney/ client privileges.nebraska wrote: ↑Sat May 21, 2022 8:44 pmWhen Laura Wasser testified she mentioned receiving the extortion letter and a small image appeared on the screen, so it seems to me that it can be read out to rebut Amber's testimony that she "wanted nothing".
Can Johnny also claim attorney/client privilege if he is called?
Any tips on how to not come across smug when doing this for tens of questions?
Adam Waldman wasn't really being coached, which to me means being told what to say. Adam was being advised by a lawyer on the things he should not say. Adam already knew not to answer the questions. It was procedural for Adam to wait for the lawyer to advise him of attorney client privilege before accepting that advice. I am sure that someone on Johnny's side will advise him that he is not to answer any questions that have anything to do with his conversations with Adam Waldman. Conversations between a lawyer and client are considered to be confidential. They can't force him to answer questions that are protected by the attorney client privileges. I am sure that AH's team can try to ask questions in a way that does not violate attorney client privilege, but they will have a hard time doing that.justintime wrote: ↑Sun May 22, 2022 12:17 pmAny tips on how to not come across smug when doing this for tens of questions?
Does he have to be careful to give the exact, same statement (“disclaimer”?) in place of a response for each question? Will he have a “coach” as Mr. Waldman did last week?
I think AH’s team will go out of their way to force him to say this as much as possible. They not only hope to uncover some vital info, but also want him to appear to be avoiding/hiding “incriminating” testimony. Both, I believe, are futile endeavors. They simply do not exist.
As long as Johnny doesn’t get uncomfortable repeating the same thing over and over, doesn’t try to be creative or mix it up or feel he has to laugh, smile, “entertain” or in some way “apologize” out of deference to the jury, he will be ok. Surely he knows what the required response must be. He would do well to practice same all day today. For legitimate questions, short, sweet, respectful!
Blow them out of the water, dear man! So near and yet so far …
No, her team has 8 hrs left and his has 18 hrs. Last I heard was that the judge said closing arguments will be on May 27.
No, Johnny's side gets to put on rebuttal witnesses. Then, each side will give their closing arguments, which is a summary of their case. Then, the jury will be given instructions and the jury will deliberate.