The Lawsuits Thread

Discuss the latest Johnny Depp news, his career, past and future projects, and other related issues.
User avatar
RumLover
Posts: 1512
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 5:02 am
Location: Sydney, AUS
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by RumLover » Tue Apr 13, 2021 8:14 pm

I have thought that the co-hoaxers might have thought they were creating a scene of destruction but the result just looked messy to police. I am sure the police in their work have seen many messy homes with spills not cleaned, books knocked over etc.
The police don't mention the dogs. Were the animals being kept safe away from the mess creation?
I am not convinced that Adam Waldman has police body-cam video. His tweets might just be a way of playing with Josh Drew's mind so that Josh wonders if there is evidence to expose him.

Someareborn
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2020 7:16 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Someareborn » Tue Apr 13, 2021 8:43 pm

I just fear that a possible discussion "messy" vs. "crime scene" could put a dent in the police' testimony. Maybe its all AH needs.

I agree with you - not sure if Adam has video footage. If he is teasing Josh....do we know if Adam tried this strategy on someone else successfully?

AdeleAgain
Posts: 1064
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 8:06 am
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by AdeleAgain » Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:31 pm

I doubt Adam is teasing one particular witness. I actually think alot of what he is doing with the tweets is keeping the faithful.

I also doubt after all this time there is body camera footage. But AH and her friends gave a pretty graphic description of the destruction.

AH will say that by the time the second set of officers arrived they had cleaned up. Did she or the others talk about the second set of police?

The fact is the two officers we had were excellent witnesses. They had no reason to lie, in fact given the post OJ Simpson protocols they would not have allowed themselves to be unprofessional. And it is simply not conceivable that four separate officers would lie abut what they saw then or now.

Given AH's description of that night and the entirely contradictory view of the police, that should be case closed. It is ridiculous it would never pass a criminal case test and I am sorry to say this again in probably less than a week for a British judge to say what he said is an utter outrage. He would never have said that if they were UK police there would have been an outcry.

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1446
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Thu Apr 15, 2021 7:26 pm

As Expected, Amber has filed to Dismiss the VA entire case (not her counterclaim) based on the NGN ruling "proving" Johnny did in fact abuse her


04/13/2021 Defendant's Motion for Amended Answer & Grounds of Defense, Supplemental Plea in Bar, Schedule a Hearing, Set Briefing Schedule and Stay Discovery Praecipe
04/13/2021 Defendant's Memorandum for Amended Answer & Grounds of Defense, Supplemental Plea in Bar, Schedule a Hearing, Set Briefing Schedule and Stay Discovery
04/13/2021 Defendant's Motion for Amended Answer & Grounds of Defense, Supplemental Plea in Bar, Schedule a Hearing, Set Briefing Schedule and Stay Discovery
Main one:
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/s ... 3-2021.pdf

Please see my tweet thread with input from Andrea (lawyer regarding VA rules of Mutuality & Collateral Estoppel)

Tweet is available if you click on it - not sure if you see an "unavailable message". I only use tweets when there are "images" connected that I have no other way to post here. Sorry

Last edited by Lbock on Thu Apr 15, 2021 7:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 1584
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Thu Apr 15, 2021 7:40 pm

Oh for :censored: 's sake, just provide the discovery already. Amber Heard's team is turning this case into a circus and I hope the judge denies this pathetic attempt to amend her answer and file yet another plea in bar or stay of discovery in light of another different case going on. This is really embarrassing trying for excuses to cover up for a client who is refusing to produce documents because they all know it is damaging for AH, just like the charity receipts.

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/s ... 3-2021.pdf
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

Granna
Posts: 268
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2019 12:44 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Granna » Thu Apr 15, 2021 7:50 pm

How is this possible? The UK trial was against the Sun. JudyMac, AdeleAgain, LBock --- for those of us who don't tap into twitter -- is this even legal? Her chances?

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 1584
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Thu Apr 15, 2021 8:15 pm

And I'm sure the timing of the filing of this motion has nothing to do with all the attention JD is getting for being in Barcelona right now for Minamanta screening and that City of Lies is the #1 film streaming right now. Oh, and did I mention JD was given a lifetime achievement award? :smiliewithhearts: :heartdance: :heartbeat:
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

Granna
Posts: 268
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2019 12:44 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Granna » Thu Apr 15, 2021 8:19 pm

ForeverYoung: Thank you for the beautiful UPLIFTING news update. Man, does AH like burning people's butts up, doesn't she. :lol:

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 1584
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Thu Apr 15, 2021 10:14 pm

Yep...she can't stand when JD gets attention especially now when she is hiding out in the desert since she left LA. I hope she stays there. Bye bye to her and her freeloading friends. :bluewave:
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

Granna
Posts: 268
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2019 12:44 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Granna » Thu Apr 15, 2021 10:42 pm

ForeverYoung: Let us hope that the VA judge dismisses this trial, with her latest maneuver.

User avatar
Lbock
Posts: 1446
Joined: Mon May 01, 2017 4:43 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Lbock » Thu Apr 15, 2021 11:00 pm

Granna wrote:
Thu Apr 15, 2021 10:42 pm
ForeverYoung: Let us hope that the VA judge dismisses this trial, with her latest maneuver.
Johnny deserves his chance to defend against her. We don’t want the case dismissed. He doesn’t want it dismissed

Granna
Posts: 268
Joined: Fri Nov 29, 2019 12:44 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Granna » Thu Apr 15, 2021 11:06 pm

LBock: Understood. But . . can the judge dismiss this, based on the ruling of the UK trial. Sorry, I don't understand. - not with all of these legal games she is playing.

User avatar
Newt
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:22 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by Newt » Fri Apr 16, 2021 5:09 am

Only serves to make her look more and more guilty in the eyes of the public. What an idiot she is.

User avatar
ForeverYoung
Posts: 1584
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:25 pm
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by ForeverYoung » Fri Apr 16, 2021 8:29 am

Lbock wrote:
Thu Apr 15, 2021 11:00 pm
Granna wrote:
Thu Apr 15, 2021 10:42 pm
ForeverYoung: Let us hope that the VA judge dismisses this trial, with her latest maneuver.
Johnny deserves his chance to defend against her. We don’t want the case dismissed. He doesn’t want it dismissed
Sorry...I meant that I hoped the VA judge dismisses the motion. My bad.
“Growing old is unavoidable, but never growing up is possible."

AdeleAgain
Posts: 1064
Joined: Mon May 15, 2017 8:06 am
Status: Offline

The Lawsuits Thread

Unread post by AdeleAgain » Fri Apr 16, 2021 8:37 am

From my understanding (1) The UK judgement does not influence whether the VA case can happen (2) AH was a witness not the defendant in the UK so it's irrelevant (3) I haven't had a chance to read the doc yet but I understand they cite very little actual law is that correct?

This is yet another means of getting attention away from - in my view - the success of City of Lies (over which she must be absolutely livid) and of course him being at the film festival. See how many journalists were there?

And I see JD dressed up for the occasion!