JOHNNY DEPP ZONE

I am curious about Adams' hints concerning possible body cam foootage. But I asked myself why AH asked for it in her subpoena, knowing that it could further undermine her hoax. Somebody on twitter explained that she may have asked about it in the first place to discredit the officers if they had ind...

Ongoing twitter chat about Adams posts. He, maybe implied, that the second set of officers had body cams on them? And, that he has obtained the footage? What are your thoughts about it?

So Elon Musk’s is on the board of Endeavor who is the parent company of William Morris Endeavor talent agency that employs Amber. Looks like Amber will be getting allot more work and Johnny just ongoing bad publicity. God forbid...this industry annoys me so much! But for sure, AH needs money, she h...

Yes interesting that AH hasn't called on Savannah. I wonder if Savannah and Nathan are both in similar positions in that testifying would expose them to possible criminal charges - Savannah over breaking immigration rules and Nathan over drug dealing - he was clearly obtaining drugs for someone els...

I am sorry if I upset you - I try to understand the legal aspect of it all - and much of it seems to be two sides of a coin. Did you mean me? You did not upset me. The VA case is a defamation case against Amber Heard. What Johnny has to prove is that what he says is more likely true than not true. ...

I am sorry if I upset you - I try to understand the legal aspect of it all - and much of it seems to be two sides of a coin. But, the case in VA is a case of defamation, isn't it? Judge already ruled that AH did write a defamatory op-ed about him. So, the burden of proof is on him, basically "provin...

I also think he has to better explain the "airplane incident" with His texts to Bettany & Stephen's texts Also the "Australia incident" where he was clearly buying and possibly using drugs. (He asked Nathan if he could get "more" suggesting what he got had been used) I agree. The "airplane incident...

I also wondered why they didn't subpoena Dr Kipper and the nurse a while back and found this online. :) https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-foreign-subp-prep-prod-david-kipper-12-1-2020.pdf So, AH issued a subpoen...

I agree, I hope JD's lawyers strategy goes beyond releasing private pictures. Because, if winning a libel case in the UK was considered to be easy, he faces an uphill battle in VA. As I understand from the claim it boils down to two incidents where JD has to prove his innocence. The "phone incident"...

Another point to remember about US trials: the burden of proof is on the plaintiff (Johnny). His side must prove their claims. She does not need to prove innocence or guilt. The plaintiff must rely on evidence and witness testimony to substantiate their claims. The typical defense strategy is to di...

Thank you for your answer! I thought it was ruled already that the op-ed was indeed about JD, ergo, defaming him?
I am sorry if it was answered somewhere already.

Will the VA trial be about all 12 incidents? Or about the original 3? Adam seems to be a perfect fit to expose her publicly. But I question the legal strategy, I doubt that any pictures will have an impact, altough its a jury. In my opinion they need to focus on sworn testimony from Dr.Kipper and al...

This is what really :censored: ! That she got away with perjury on the stand and all the obvious lies. I have no hope that some of her friends will come forward about the hoax, there is just no reason to do it now! Two courts did not question their "evidence". One thing that might creep up on her is...

I haven't had the time to read the judgement yet, but I am also very disappointed by todays decision. Maybe the judges somehow "protected" him for another loss at a retrial. But I seriously question myself how a case this clear could go so wrong and against any feeling of justice. Maybe because its ...

Assuming that AH will somehow get away with the "pledge" being fulfilled to the ACLU over 10 years that does not cover the 3.5million to CHLA. A twitter account did the math and CHLA seem to miss 2.65 Mio. (When you accept anonymus donations made on her behalf until this point...) Do CHLA also have ...