JOHNNY DEPP ZONE

I think Meeps might mean the second tape of the phone call - where she says no one will believe you. That seemed to me like his recording (because we can hear him when it disconnects). It's all a bit confusing but it seems odd to me that if she didn't know about the call being recorded - she would ...

California is a two party consent state. That means both parties have to give consent to record a conversation. I quickly found this: California's wiretapping law is a "two-party consent" law. California makes it a crime to record or eavesdrop on any confidential communication, including a private ...

AND Javier Bardem didn't let his wife - Penelope Cruz - do all the talking for them both :truefan: :love: :loveshower: Johnny Depp Gets Support From Javier Bardem -- Allegations Against Him Are 'Lies and Manipulations' Mar 24, 2020 at 4:01 am UTC By Mike Walters Johnny Depp just received more suppo...

That text with its "I will stop at nothing" was, as far as I have understood, send in 2016. But Johnny still held back until now. Protested and kept telling the truth; that he isn't an abuser. But didn't drag her to court immediately as he could also have done back then. Then again it turned out to ...

So Ms Heard risking not only her own life but also the lives of people around her is supposed to be a good thing - a heroic deed - while Johnny staying put, as we're told to do, is a coward ... If that is the quality of their arguments then I think Johnny, and his relatives here including me, can re...

Yes, and that is good. That they will admit that he's 'found' - never mind that she's said so all along - yet another who defends him. And it's a very sweet and eloquently "defence" or rather just statement of the truth, I think :rosegirl: But while Page Six mentioned Amber's lies they "accidentally...

As for Whitney: Johnny pleaded with her to settle out of court quietly and peacefully but she refused. Amber is the one who would have put Whitney in the heat, not him. The recordings show that he really tried, practically begged her not to go forward but all she cared about was her name and nobody...

Yes, but if the VA case is settled out of court with a more or less comprehensive, and probably grumpy, apology from AH, doesn't Johnny risk that she claims ever afterwards to have been coerced by his "huge wealth" and "great power in Hollywood"? I would feel a bit safer, if a judge and jury clearly...

Great! For Johnny and us, that is
Then she can't wriggle out of testifying with the excuse that president Trump has decided to erect a virtual wall in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean

Amen to that :tear: And here's more proof - look at how her new lady love is dressed here. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-8087547/Amber-Heard-proves-love-air-jets-LA-holding-hands-Bianca-Butti.html?fbclid=IwAR1dkCThW0Bdl8k81ZJ32K0hZG-tibebCE7BZHD_txPK3VJpcQHscRauCXs Johnny should sue ...

More text messages both between AH and Johnny, and a third party.

he claims his was forced to pay £5million to compensate her.

Of course he doesn't, because he wasn't! Johnny is not stupid, savvy?

As for the date of the cut off fingertip; that must be in Johnny's medical records, right? Can Ms Heard get in trouble with the court, if she has given the wrong date?

So the guys, who in my youth, said "Everything is political" were right ... Fancy that
I am just sorry Barnaby won. Yes, he had the law on his side, but did he have to be so impolite and delight in dragging Johnny down?

Yes, they don't have any arguments against the truth, so pretend they can't "hear" him. Which is also a form of abuse; letting the other part talk, yell, or scream, while the abuser ignores him, until he tires and go away